Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:41:52 -0400
From:      Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>
To:        "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@freebsd.org>,  "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>,  "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r316029 - head/contrib/llvm/tools/lld/ELF
Message-ID:  <CAPyFy2BRSDeB%2B3-j_eg-j26knxcmfoNQw2dX2W7zAHBYGpE2kQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <201703271601.v2RG1GeY057276@repo.freebsd.org>
References:  <201703271601.v2RG1GeY057276@repo.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 27 March 2017 at 12:01, Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Author: emaste
> Date: Mon Mar 27 16:01:16 2017
> New Revision: 316029
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/316029
>
> Log:
>   lld: hack version and help output for compatibility with libtool

For the record, I think this is a terrible hack and I wish we didn't
need it. However, it was committed upstream and should be the most
expedient way to get libtool-using third party software to link with
lld.

As Sean Silva wrote in https://reviews.llvm.org/D31199:
    Btw, I think this is one of the clearest proofs that LLD has
crossed a big milestone and is now entering "production quality". You
don't see this kind of hack in a non-production-quality program.

I still hope libtool will gain native support for lld, and perhaps
many years from now this can be removed.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyFy2BRSDeB%2B3-j_eg-j26knxcmfoNQw2dX2W7zAHBYGpE2kQ>