Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 08:36:15 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> Subject: Re: support for __thread Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10312220835380.26844-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20031222060137.GA87552@dan.emsphone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Dec 22), Daniel Eischen said: > > I'd like to stay away from maintaining libc_r any further; not that > > it can't be done, but with libkse and libthr around, why? > > Do gdb and pstack (in ports) handle libkse or libthr threads? libc_r I don't know what pstack is, but we should have gdb for 5.3R. > is a great debugging tool, if nothing else. I can't even attach to a > libkse-threaded program with gdb; the tracee gets SIGSTOP'ped, and gdb > just sits there. You have to kill -9 gdb from another tty, and the > tracee dies. gdb can attach to a libc_r program, view all the threads, > and detach without affecting the tracee.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10312220835380.26844-100000>