Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 08:45:43 +0200 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl> To: Paul Richards <paul@netsynergy.co.uk> Cc: Don Lewis <Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com>, Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern init_main.c kern_exec.c kern_exit.ckern_fork.c kern_proc.c kern_prot.c kern_resource.c uipc_socket.cuipc_socket2.c uipc_usrreq.c vfs_aio.c src/sys/sys proc.hresourcevar.h ucred.h Message-ID: <20000906084543.A16892@lucifer.bart.nl> In-Reply-To: <39B5AB9D.63C8938C@netsynergy.co.uk>; from paul@netsynergy.co.uk on Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 03:27:41AM %2B0100 References: <200009052211.PAA70424@freefall.freebsd.org> <39B581FE.7E78128B@netsynergy.co.uk> <200009060222.TAA26628@salsa.gv.tsc.tdk.com> <39B5AB9D.63C8938C@netsynergy.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-On [20000906 04:30], Paul Richards (paul@netsynergy.co.uk) wrote: >Don Lewis wrote: >> Maybe the -current version of GENERIC should enable INVARIANTS, for >> the same reason that we crank up malloc debugging. > >I have long advocated enabling INVARIANTS on the current branch. I have never encountered a person using CURRENT using a GENERIC kernel. On the other hand, it might help when people use GENERIC as kernel template. However, the real coders probably know the meaning of INVARIANTS and enable this anyway, and the persons trying CURRENT for whatever reasons might not know it and just remove it. I am not really sure there is an added benefit to adding it to GENERIC. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Network- and systemadministrator <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl> VIA Net.Works The Netherlands BSD: Technical excellence at its best http://www.via-net-works.nl I sought for myself... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000906084543.A16892>