Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 08:58:58 +0800 From: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> To: Sean McNeil <sean@mcneil.com> Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: signal handler priority issue Message-ID: <40CA5552.9090900@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <1086993632.45971.2.camel@server.mcneil.com> References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10406110432370.12394-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> <1086944114.76446.5.camel@server.mcneil.com> <1086946114.76446.16.camel@server.mcneil.com> <1086977738.70017.9.camel@server.mcneil.com> <40CA330F.5090103@freebsd.org> <1086993632.45971.2.camel@server.mcneil.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sean McNeil wrote: >What old signal mask? It should be the signals that sigsuspend allows >that get handled within sigsuspend. Make sure the following can still >happen: > >signal is masked. >sigsuspend is called with signal unmasked. >signal comes in or is pending already. >signal handler is called. >sigsuspend returns. > >Sean > > please try : http://people.freebsd.org/~davidxu/kse/sigsuspend.diff David Xu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40CA5552.9090900>