Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 08:53:42 +0000 (UTC) From: Vadim Goncharov <vadim_nuclight@mail.ru> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Behavior of `ipfw table n list' in 7.0 Message-ID: <slrnftsccm.1dfj.vadim_nuclight@hostel.avtf.net> References: <20080314232456.GQ91152@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu> <47DB1C6A.8050908@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Julian Elischer! On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 17:46:34 -0700; Julian Elischer wrote about 'Re: Behavior of `ipfw table n list' in 7.0': > I think the dotted quad part is mentioned somewhere, but anyhow > a patch was put in to add a specific option to ipfw(8) to request > the quad notation If you get a new version of ipfw(8) it should > have the fix.. > Or pull the fix from the freebsd source cvs web page.. > pull and apply the diff for revision 1.114 from the following page > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sbin/ipfw/ipfw2.c > and apply it and then reinstall it. > that reminds me I need to merge this back to RELENG_7 Oh, and to RELENG_6 please, too. Then PR 120720 can be said to fully closed, yes. -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:vadim_nuclight@mail.ru [Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org][LJ:/nuclight]
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?slrnftsccm.1dfj.vadim_nuclight>