Date: Mon, 11 May 1998 13:00:01 -0400 (EDT) From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> To: Travis Mikalson <bofh@terranova.net> Cc: Greg Rowe <greg@uswest.net>, am@f1.ru, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SCSI problems? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980511125657.756B-100000@hub.org> In-Reply-To: <35571882.43A9@terranova.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 11 May 1998, Travis Mikalson wrote: > Greg Rowe wrote: > > > > The 2940UW is revision E (rev 1) which won't handle any kind of load with the > > current Adaptec code. We're going to test the CAM code with the Revision E's > > this week to see if the problem still exists. (Verify this by running a number > > of bonnie tests to be certain) You can either put a Revision D controller in > > (rev 0) or drop the transfer rate in the SCSI setup to 10 MBS to fix the > > problem. > > > > Greg > ahc0: <Adaptec 2940 Ultra SCSI host adapter> rev 0x00 int a irq 10 on pci0.11.0 ahc0: aic7880 Wide Channel, SCSI Id=7, 16 SCBs ahc1: <Adaptec 2940 Ultra SCSI host adapter> rev 0x01 int a irq 11 on pci0.12.0 ahc1: aic7880 Wide Channel, SCSI Id=7, 16 SCBs I have the above two controllers in this machine...am I correct in assuming that the 'rev 0x00' above is the Revision D controller? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980511125657.756B-100000>