Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 16:10:36 +0900 (JST) From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> To: jfv@FreeBSD.org Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h if_em_hw.c if_em_hw.h if_em_osdep.h Message-ID: <20061028.161036.78701604.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200610280137.k9S1bFq2089275@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200610280137.k9S1bFq2089275@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --]
Jack F Vogel <jfv@FreeBSD.org> wrote
in <200610280137.k9S1bFq2089275@repoman.freebsd.org>:
jf> jfv 2006-10-28 01:37:14 UTC
jf>
jf> FreeBSD src repository
jf>
jf> Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_6)
jf> sys/dev/em if_em.c if_em.h if_em_hw.c if_em_hw.h
jf> if_em_osdep.h
jf> Log:
jf> Merge of Intel 6.2.9 em driver code.
jf> Approved by: re, scottl, jhb, pdeuskar
jf>
jf> Revision Changes Path
jf> 1.65.2.19 +731 -589 src/sys/dev/em/if_em.c
jf> 1.32.2.5 +97 -71 src/sys/dev/em/if_em.h
jf> 1.16.2.4 +574 -531 src/sys/dev/em/if_em_hw.c
jf> 1.15.2.5 +96 -148 src/sys/dev/em/if_em_hw.h
jf> 1.14.2.3 +46 -52 src/sys/dev/em/if_em_osdep.h
Just wanted to make sure, but is the following change in if_em.c
really intentional? This means that the new version no longer
supports 82542...
Index: if_em.c
@@ -116,8 +117,6 @@
{ 0x8086, E1000_DEV_ID_82541GI_LF, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0},
{ 0x8086, E1000_DEV_ID_82541GI_MOBILE, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0},
- { 0x8086, E1000_DEV_ID_82542, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0},
-
{ 0x8086, E1000_DEV_ID_82543GC_FIBER, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0},
{ 0x8086, E1000_DEV_ID_82543GC_COPPER, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0},
--
| Hiroki SATO
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBFQwJtTyzT2CeTzy0RAubzAJ9zmXYe5tgB69xP5rdrDzyGAk4GeACffKWs
mEQVA09EB58Y25H1bNOf9Fo=
=1Az0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061028.161036.78701604.hrs>