Date: Mon, 12 Jun 1995 22:52:23 +0200 (MET DST) From: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr (Ollivier Robert) To: rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com (Rodney W. Grimes) Cc: root@dva.in-berlin.de, phk@ref.tfs.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Which CTM# == 2.0.5R? Message-ID: <199506122052.WAA17662@blaise.ibp.fr> In-Reply-To: <199506121704.KAA02385@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> from "Rodney W. Grimes" at Jun 12, 95 10:04:09 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> with 99% probability of being right what is now in the ctm area is the > 2.0.5R bits since I allowed the last update_usrall to finish before I > stop the cronjob to do the tag operation. Infact I would say with > 99.999999% probablility :-). I have not started any of this up so > if you check right now you will get it. The last cvs-cur received here was : CTM_BEGIN 2.0 cvs-cur 770 19950610200001Z . It was just before you closed CTM for the tagging/merge after the release. I'd say what all CTMers have is either -current (stopped around June, 1st) or 2.0.5R if src-cur was made from the RELENG_2_0_5 branch and not from -current (which I doubt). So I think all src-cur CTMers have -current without last 2.0.5 fixes... cvs-cur CTMers have anything they extract :-) -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD keltia 2.0-BUILT-19950503 #3: Wed May 3 19:53:04 MET DST 1995
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199506122052.WAA17662>