Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 12:30:55 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: "J. T. Farmer" <jfarmer@goldsword.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.0-BETA2 Available Message-ID: <20050806163055.GA20063@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <42F4AFC0.8010907@goldsword.com> References: <20050806035132.BB14A5D07@ptavv.es.net> <42F4AFC0.8010907@goldsword.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 08:40:32AM -0400, J. T. Farmer wrote: > Kevin Oberman wrote: >=20 > >I would suggest that it would have been better to post to current as 6.0 > >is not yet stable and most of the people who deal with problems are much > >more likely to see problems reported there. > >=20 > > >=20 > Ok, so I'm a bit confused. The answer given for the the DMA_WRITE and > DMA_READ errors experienced under 5.4 with PATA and SATA is to try 6.0. >=20 > If 6.0 is not considered Stable, what are we supposed to do if we want > to run Stable? Try it to see if the bug is fixed there, and if so, it gives data about how to proceed (e.g. maybe there is a bug fix which could be merged to 5.x). Kris --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC9OW/Wry0BWjoQKURAqBOAJ0T7Q7wo0ONsdj1ptb2pnLKtT8DvQCg069K ZpaFYjAmXlHhwm2AArzYcFY= =m453 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050806163055.GA20063>