Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 19:59:11 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: Martin Blapp <mb@imp.ch> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, tmm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: need help: ld final link failed. Memory exhausted Message-ID: <20020424025911.GA38320@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <20020424045427.A25548-100000@levais.imp.ch> References: <20020424045427.A25548-100000@levais.imp.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Martin Blapp <mb@imp.ch> [020423 19:55] wrote: > > Hi, > > Setting the max stacksize to 128MB helped. Can we have this as > default ? > > As many users plan to use staroffice, requiring them to recompile > kernel just for this would be ... > > Anyway, is there a reason that the maxstack is 64MB only ? Because 64MB of stack should be enough for anybody? -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' Tax deductible donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020424025911.GA38320>