Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 10:07:15 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, Garrett Cooper <ngie@FreeBSD.org>, Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> Subject: Re: svn commit: r277737 - in head: etc/pam.d tools/build/mk Message-ID: <86iofslhh8.fsf@nine.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20150127071937.GB77865@FreeBSD.org> (Alexey Dokuchaev's message of "Tue, 27 Jan 2015 07:19:37 %2B0000") References: <201501260850.t0Q8oDna015719@svn.freebsd.org> <86fvax91cy.fsf@nine.des.no> <F9F10CE5-3282-4BDF-AA65-9FF1F994412E@gmail.com> <20150127071937.GB77865@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> writes: > As someone who writes makefile daily I would agree, but there should be a > reason why it was always done with _foo. One obvious one is that it shows > up front all possible values, including conditional ones, which can also > help not to forget something when backporting changes somewhere else. ;-) Mainly that, yes. And this is the idiom used in ../rc.d. Garrett's version seems to be the preferred idiom when listing source files. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86iofslhh8.fsf>