Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:56:52 +0200 From: Benjamin Walkenhorst <krylon@gmx.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X.org performance? Message-ID: <20040920175652.4ecc141e.krylon@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <b2807d040409200710568b4976@mail.gmail.com> References: <20040918165741.20d10137.krylon@gmx.net> <200409181101.25973.josh@tcbug.org> <20040918183953.0666ea91.krylon@gmx.net> <b2807d040409200710568b4976@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 19:40:30 +0530 Subhro <subhro.kar@gmail.com> wrote: > cat /etc/make.conf ------------------------ PERL_VER=5.8.2 PERL_VERSION=5.8.2 PERL_ARCH=mach NOPERL=yo NO_PERL=yo NO_PERL_WRAPPER=yo CPUTYPE=athlon-mp CFLAGS+= -O2 -pipe X_WINDOW_SYSTEM=xorg ------------------------ But like I said, I think I chose the wrong words - X.org does not perform poorly, it's just that it sometimes will use lots of CPU, and I am under the impression it does even more so than XFree did. Or is it just my perception kidding me? Kind regards, Benjamin -- If cars had improved at [the computer industry's] rate, a Rolls Royce would now cost 10 dollars and get a billion miles per gallon. (Unfortunately, it would probably also have 200-page manual telling how to open the door.) -- Andrew Tanenbaum, "Introduction To Distributed Systems"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040920175652.4ecc141e.krylon>