Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 11:11:39 +0100 From: Pete French <petefrench@ticketswitch.com> To: andriy@irbisnet.com, avg@icyb.net.ua Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Serious zfs slowdown when mixed with another file system (ufs/msdosfs/etc.). Message-ID: <E1P49vP-000NDI-Ah@dilbert.ticketswitch.com> In-Reply-To: <7C062F92-B514-49FF-BE28-90B7784A5CB6@irbisnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Ok. But how stable (production ready) the FreeBSD-8-STABLE is? What is your opinion? I am running 8-STABLE from 27th September on all our ptoduction machines (from webservers to database servers to the company mail server) and it is fine. I am going to update again over the next few days, as there are some ZFS fixes in which I want - and which may benifit you too - so I will be able to report back next week as to how a more recent version behaves. In general though, I have never had problems running STABLE on prodyction systems over the years. Of course what I do is to test it on a singlre machine before rolling it out (a leaf in a webfarm so if it goes down it wont affect the business) but it is usually fine. keep an eye on -STABLE mailing list though, as that is where problems arise. I watch that, and also the dailing commits, either here http://www.freshbsd.org/?branch=RELENG_8&project=freebsd&committer=&module=&q= or here http://www.secnetix.de/olli/FreeBSD/svnews/?p=stable/8 Just to see whats going into the tree relative to whats being discussed. It only takes a few minutes a dat to monitor the mailin lists and the commits, and the result is that we've been running STABLE for a very long time (close to a decade I suspect) with great success. -pete.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1P49vP-000NDI-Ah>