Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 01:37:41 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Cc: obrien@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: gcc compile error Message-ID: <199912300937.BAA49705@rah.star-gate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 30 Dec 1999 17:23:52 %2B0800." <19991230092352.42BEA1CC6@overcee.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> "David O'Brien" wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 29, 1999 at 11:37:18AM -0800, Amancio Hasty wrote:
> > > This is the scoop.
> > ..snip..
> > > gcc -v
> > > Using builtin specs.
> > > gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)
> > ..snip..
> > > Without -O or -O2 the program compiles okay.
> >
> > What other platforms w/gcc 2.95 have you tried to build this X11 version
> > on? What other non-Linux platforms w/gcc 2.95 have you tried to build
> > this X11 version on? Do you have a problem if you download the official
> > GCC 2.95.2 release and build it the old GNU'fashion way? Does a purely
> > stock GCC 2.95 bomb on this?? If so, it is a GCC problem and the issue
> > should be raised with Cygnus.
>
> Yes it is a gcc-2.95.2 bug. It's fixed in the 2.96 snapshot in
> ports/lang/gcc-devel.
>
Yeap,
gcc-devel installed from the ports directory:
gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i386-portbld-freebsd4.0/2.96/specs
gcc version 2.96 19991110 (experimental)
{root} gcc -c -O2 bug.c
That is as Peter said the bug is fixed on the 2.96 snapshot and I am currently
rebuilding X on my other system will find out more when the build finishes in
about 1/2 hour.
Take Care
--
Amancio Hasty
hasty@rah.star-gate.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199912300937.BAA49705>