Date: Tue, 26 Mar 1996 14:13:38 -0500 (EST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@ki.net> To: michael butler <imb@scgt.oz.au> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Stable not very stable Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960326141130.25014F-100000@ki.net> In-Reply-To: <199603260336.OAA02953@asstdc.scgt.oz.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 26 Mar 1996, michael butler wrote:
> With ~100k articles a day from the limited newsfeed I receive for the last
> 10 days, I think that counts as "working" :-) The motherboard is a Chinese
> "no-name" flavour. The kernel's compiled with AHC_TAGENABLE and
> QUEUE_FULL_SUPPORTED, NFS_ASYNC, NMBCLUSTERS=1024, CHILD_MAX=256, and
> OPEN_MAX=256 and runs with the news spool, overview and active file-systems
> mounted "async".
>
Not sure, but do any of these apply to the NCR SCSI controller?
Or better yet, will any of them make any difference to the NCR SCSI controller?
I have {CHILD/OPEN}_MAX set to 128 right now, NMBCLUSTERS set to
default, but neither of those, I would think, would affect the SCSI
controller itself.
NFS_ASYNC? Again, I wouldn't think so...but ya never know.
AHC_TAGENABLE sounds like an adaptec'ism...?
QUEUE_FULL_SUPPORTED??
Thanks...
Marc G. Fournier | POP Mail Telnet Acct DNS Hosting
System | WWW Services Database Services | Knowledge,
Administrator | | Information and
scrappy@ki.net | WWW: http://www.ki.net | Communications, Inc
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960326141130.25014F-100000>