Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 11:23:56 -0800 (PST) From: Sam Leffler <sam@FreeBSD.org> To: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: PERFORCE change 43155 for review Message-ID: <200311291923.hATJNuch042998@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=43155 Change 43155 by sam@sam_ebb on 2003/11/29 11:23:07 o don't let bpf_mtap2 fall back to bpf_tap; though it could if the prepended data segment length was also zero o correct pktlen in bpf_mtap2 to include prepended segment Affected files ... .. //depot/projects/netperf/sys/net/bpf.c#11 edit Differences ... ==== //depot/projects/netperf/sys/net/bpf.c#11 (text+ko) ==== @@ -1242,10 +1242,6 @@ u_int pktlen, slen; pktlen = m_length(m, NULL); - if (pktlen == m->m_len) { - bpf_tap(bp, mtod(m, u_char *), pktlen); - return; - } /* * Craft on-stack mbuf suitable for passing to bpf_filter. * Note that we cut corners here; we only setup what's @@ -1254,6 +1250,7 @@ mb.m_next = m; mb.m_data = data; mb.m_len = dlen; + pktlen += dlen; BPFIF_LOCK(bp); for (d = bp->bif_dlist; d != 0; d = d->bd_next) {
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200311291923.hATJNuch042998>