Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 09:40:26 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Ville-Pertti Keinonen <will@iki.fi> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: just found this Message-ID: <199909291540.JAA03116@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "29 Sep 1999 10:45:16 %2B0300." <867lla5fg2.fsf@not.demophon.com> References: <867lla5fg2.fsf@not.demophon.com> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9909272351370.327-100000@culverk.student.umd.edu> <199909282101.PAA06277@harmony.village.org.newsgate.clinet.fi>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <867lla5fg2.fsf@not.demophon.com> Ville-Pertti Keinonen writes: : It isn't in -current, does this mean that it wasn't considered an : acceptable long-term solution? It wasn't a problem in -current due to a different way that things were done there. : Really large numbers of hardlinks are probably rare enough, but the : default limit of 4 seems a bit low, it should probably be at least as : high as the maximum link count encountered on a normal installation. : There are other ways to hold down at least as much memory per file you : can keep open as with the limit of 4. I think phk's idea in this area are likely the best way to deal. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199909291540.JAA03116>