Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:17:01 -0400 From: Richard Coleman <rcoleman@criticalmagic.com> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: rwatson@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: devd Message-ID: <42B75C7D.2050103@criticalmagic.com> In-Reply-To: <20050620.124905.35871665.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20050619012425.L56734@fledge.watson.org> <20050620.124905.35871665.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
M. Warner Losh wrote: > devd won't be rewritten to not use C++. That's a non-option. > > Warner Out of curiosity, why is that? I have nothing against C++, but that stance seems surprising. I have not scanned the tree, but I was under the impression that very little of the base system that is written in C++. Richard Coleman rcoleman@criticalmagic.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42B75C7D.2050103>