Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 09:09:05 +0900 (JST) From: Mori Hiroki <yamori813@yahoo.co.jp> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com>, "josef.lar@gmail.com" <josef.lar@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-mips@freebsd.org" <freebsd-mips@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Routing performance (Buffalo WZR-HP-G301NH) Message-ID: <161784.64603.qm@web101702.mail.ssk.yahoo.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmo=BMTVVcyTpY8NqcsuLKdGtXnQSbfduWqgejdveNtbukw@mail.gmail.com> References: <69b4cfd1-1664-ebbf-5734-7be38a70e938@gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmo=BMTVVcyTpY8NqcsuLKdGtXnQSbfduWqgejdveNtbukw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi=0A=0AI add iperf3 profile to ZRouter and check network performance.=0A= =0AThis is result.=0A=0AWZR-HP-G300NH=0A=0AAR9132=0A=0A=0A[=A0 4] =A0 0.00-= 10.04=A0 sec =A0 118 MBytes=A0 98.2 Mbits/sec=A0 =A0 0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 sender=0A[=A0 4] =A0 0.00-10.04=A0 sec =A0 118 MBytes=A0 98.2 Mbits/sec= =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 receiver=0A=0AWZR-HP-AG300H=0A=0AAR7161= =0A=0A=0A[=A0 4] =A0 0.00-10.03=A0 sec =A0 222 MBytes =A0 186 Mbits/sec=A0 = =A0 0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 sender=0A[=A0 4] =A0 0.00-10.03=A0 sec =A0 22= 2 MBytes =A0 186 Mbits/sec=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 receiver=0A= =0AI seem=A0AR9132 is slower than=A0AR7161=0A=0AAlso you can tcp tuning on = sysctl.=0A=0AHiroki Mori=0A=0A=0A----- Original Message -----=0A> From: Adr= ian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com>=0A> To: josef.lar@gmail.com=0A> Cc: "fre= ebsd-mips@freebsd.org. Robert Pera" <mips@freebsd.org>=0A> Date: 2018/6/12,= Tue 06:39=0A> Subject: Re: Routing performance (Buffalo WZR-HP-G301NH)=0A>= =0A> Hi!=0A> =0A> Ok, so!=0A> =0A> * the seiral console hurts a lot. Don't= print stuff on the console=0A> whilst testing.=0A> * I've done a writeup o= n this when I dug into it a couple years ago.=0A> https://adrianchadd.blogs= pot.com/=0A> =0A> =0A> =0A> -adrian=0A> =0A> On Fri, 4 May 2018 at 02:22, J= osef Larsson <josef.lar@gmail.com> wrote:=0A>> =0A>> Hi,=0A>> =0A>> I wou= ld like to use the Buffalo WZR-HP-G301NH as a router with pf. I use=0A>> a= custom built ZRouter image for this. This works in practice, but I am=0A>>= not happy with the performance (I basically can't download faster than=0A= >> 80 mbit/s).=0A>> =0A>> I have a couple of concerns:=0A>> =0A>> 1. Acc= ording to ps aux, there is an interrupt load at about 9 - 10 %=0A>> during= idle conditions. Is this reasonable? It seems high to me.=0A>> 2. When I = am running "pmcstat -TS instructions -w1", there seems =0A> to be a=0A>> l= ot of action going on in uart_ar71xx_probe. Is this reasonable? There=0A>> = are some unknown functions, and I am suspect that the function names are= =0A>> not resolved correctly. Also, apb_attach is invoked a lot according= =0A>> pmcstat. While the sampling percentage for this function is less tha= n 2=0A>> %, I still find it odd that an attach function is invoked at idle= ...=0A>> 3. When downloading a large file, the system becomes pretty much= =0A>> unresponsive. When a "ps aux" call actually goes through, one can = =0A> see=0A>> that the CPU is busy with ~100 % interrupt handling. This is= what I=0A>> would like to profile with pmcstat, but the arge functions do= not show=0A>> up as functions with high load, which is not really what I = expect at=0A>> this point, since the interrupt definitely has to do with t= he LAN load.=0A>> Any suggestions on how to profile the arge driver?=0A>> = =0A>> Best regards,=0A>> =0A>> Josef Larsson=0A>> =0A>> =0A> ____________= ___________________________________=0A> freebsd-mips@freebsd.org mailing li= st=0A> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mips=0A>; To unsub= scribe, send any mail to =0A> "freebsd-mips-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"=0A>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?161784.64603.qm>