Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 01 Sep 1998 09:06:33 +0000
From:      Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
To:        Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu>
Cc:        John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au>, Ben Smithurst <ben@scientia.demon.co.uk>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: HEADS UP: Today is E-day 
Message-ID:  <199809010906.JAA04142@word.smith.net.au>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 01 Sep 1998 09:47:29 -0400." <Pine.BSF.4.00.9809010942190.353-100000@picnic.mat.net> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> 
> On Tue, 1 Sep 1998, John Birrell wrote:
> 
> > If you haven't already done so, edit /etc/rc and change the _LDC line
> > to reference /usr/lib/aout instead of /usr/lib. Once you do that and
> > re-run ldconfig (or just reboot), your aout libraries will function
> > normally (they are deprecated, though).
> 
> I'm a little confused.  I did the upgrade, but I'd had the _LDC pointing
> to /usr/lib/aout beforehand, because that's where the new libs were
> being put.  The upgrade seemed to stick new aout libs in /usr/lib/aout,
> but also put new libs in /usr/lib.  File doesn't tell me if the ones in
> /usr/lib are ELF or not, but from the timestamp on those (which is a few
> minutes after the timestamp on the /usr/lib/aout ones) I suspect that
> they are.  If my system is now ELF, why the advice to add /usr/lib/aout
> to my _LDC?  Especially since I had already had /usr/lib/aout replacing
> /usr/lib in the _LDC, shouldn't I take the "/aout" off now that I've
> upgraded?
> 
> Oddly enough, I checked one of my new executeables in /usr/bin, and ldd
> tells me that it's linked to libs in /usr/lib, even tho /usr/lib itself
> isn't on my _LDC line.  I'm a little confused by this.

Read the rest of the message that you're replying to:

> > ldconfig will die with aout. ELF does not need hints since it handles
> > just a single version number of a library and knowing that can go straight
> > to the library name.
> > 
> > /usr/lib is the normal place for system libraries, so the elf versions
> > belong there. You don't need to make any links in /usr/lib. In fact you
> > should just stick with what the build process puts there.


-- 
\\  Sometimes you're ahead,       \\  Mike Smith
\\  sometimes you're behind.      \\  mike@smith.net.au
\\  The race is long, and in the  \\  msmith@freebsd.org
\\  end it's only with yourself.  \\  msmith@cdrom.com



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199809010906.JAA04142>