Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:23:56 -0500 From: Mark Felder <feld@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GCC withdraw Message-ID: <1377285836.31114.13416825.5F534A08@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <5217A7D8.1030806@freebsd.org> References: <20130822200902.GG94127@funkthat.com> <105E26EE-8471-49D3-AB57-FBE2779CF8D0@FreeBSD.org> <5217413A.9080105@passap.ru> <20130823111647.GT2951@home.opsec.eu> <52174D51.2050601@digsys.bg> <21414.1377258940@critter.freebsd.dk> <5217A7D8.1030806@freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013, at 13:20, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 8/23/13 7:55 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > In message <52174D51.2050601@digsys.bg>, Daniel Kalchev writes: > > > >>> - 9.x gcc default and clang in base; > >>> - 10.x clang default and gcc in ports; > >> I believe this is the best idea so far. As long as these ports work with > >> gcc in ports, that is. > > +1 > > > well as I was forced to go back to gcc to get a compiling & running > kernel on my VPS (xen) > I'm not convinced that clang is there yet. I'd be really grumpy if I > had to go through al the ports hoopla to recompile my kernel. > > Curious which Xen version. I'd like to try to replicate this issue. I've seen FreeBSD 10 run just fine on XenServer 6.0 and 6.2.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1377285836.31114.13416825.5F534A08>