Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 12:38:23 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> To: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@flugsvamp.com>, Darren Reed <darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, ps@FreeBSD.ORG, Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca Subject: Re: 4.0_STABLE Broken (was Re: FTP proxy without translation no longer working? (fwd)) Message-ID: <2989.958937903@localhost> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 21 May 2000 15:33:58 EDT." <20000521153358.R86725@jade.chc-chimes.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Should this be the policy when we find a bug in vinum or pkg_*, > for example? If it was just *introduced*, yes. -stable is not supposed to go backwards in the stability dept. > This is an odd mixture of options thats causing the problem, > not something breaking everyones machine. All the best bugs are like this. That doesn't stop them from being bugs. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2989.958937903>