Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 15:41:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Dispatcher <dispatch@blackhelicopters.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: -stable vs -current (was Re: solid NFS patch #6... ) Message-ID: <199905021941.PAA22423@blackhelicopters.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
#Tim Vanderhoek wrote: #On Fri, Apr 30, 1999 at 04:52:58PM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: #> #> I expect the 3.2 release to be a really good release. # #I seem to recall that 2.2.x wasn't even called "-stable" until 2.2.2. #That .2 release is exactly where 3.x is right now... And it wasn't until 2.2.5 that I saw an official note saying "2.1.7 users should upgrade now." I won't upgrade my mission-critical systems until I see a similar notice from Jordan or someone in his place. For mission-critical systems, I'm still installing 2.2.8-stable. ==ml To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199905021941.PAA22423>