Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:04:21 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <eitanadlerlist@gmail.com> To: Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net> Cc: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@math.missouri.edu>, Michel Talon <talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Alternatives to gcc (was Re: gcc 4.3: when will it become standard compiler?) Message-ID: <496D0FE5.1040903@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20090113044111.134EC1CC0B@ptavv.es.net> References: <20090113044111.134EC1CC0B@ptavv.es.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Smells like FUD to me. In all of my reading, I have never seen such a > claim. There may be some GPLv3 issues, but I seriously doubt this is > one. Which leads to my next question: why not upgrade? -- Eitan Adler "Security is increased by designing for the way humans actually behave." -Jakob Nielsen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?496D0FE5.1040903>