Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 01:22:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Gabe <nrml@att.net> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, VANHULLEBUS Yvan <vanhu@freebsd.org>, Scott Ullrich <sullrich@gmail.com> Subject: Re: IPSEC NAT traversal Message-ID: <481652.51363.qm@web83809.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20090506135851.R72053@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--- On Wed, 5/6/09, Bjoern A. Zeeb <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: > On Wed, 6 May 2009, Gabe wrote: > > Hi, > > I had been travelling yesterday, ... here is the summary > for today: > > > So how is it coming along? > > It's compiling; it's on might notebook since last > night as well. It > hasn't crashed yet. I haven't tested IPsec yet > either though;) > That'll probably happen the next days. Need to build a > custom > ipsec-tools port first. > Ahh, please do let us know how your IPSec testing comes along when you get to it. > > Is the goal to standardize this and commit it to > become a permanent > > part of freebsd? I've got a total of three > machines with this patch > > and would reeeeally like it if it were. > > Stadardize as in between everyone is not going to work. > Different > people have already adopted different APIs but trying to be > as > compatible with netbsd/linux sounds like a plan. OS X is > different, > unfortunately. > I see. > Having it in FreeBSD 8.x is definitively on the schedule. > Awesome, looking forward to that. > /bz > > -- Bjoern A. Zeeb The greatest risk is > not taking one. Thanks for the reply!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?481652.51363.qm>