Date: Sun, 23 Jul 1995 18:30:40 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> To: wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de Cc: current@freebsd.org, joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Subject: Re: New options for lastcomm(1) Message-ID: <199507240130.SAA17222@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> In-Reply-To: <199507231009.MAA01071@localhost> from "Wolfram Schneider" at Jul 23, 95 12:09:09 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > J. Wunsch writes: > >As Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > >> > >> > The additions would make sense for me. > >> > >> Find someone running accounting to review your ``cleanedup'' diff > >> and I am all for addeded functionality to lastcomm as a 2 mintue > >> read of the current lastcomm man pages shows it to be seriously > >> lacking in functionality of just what data it can produce :-(. > > > >So who is running accounting? (Or can someone explain me in a > >nutshell what i'd have to setup? I'd try it myself, even though i > >cannot bill someone, it's at least interesting. ;-) > > I use accounting as poor man's (k)trace, for debugging and > optimization of shell/perl scripts. Why do that when we have ktrace in FreeBSD??? -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Reliable computers for FreeBSD
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199507240130.SAA17222>