Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 27 Jun 2003 13:46:55 +0200
From:      =?iso-8859-1?Q?John_B=E4ckstrand?= <sandos@home.se>
To:        "Eugene Grosbein" <eugen@grosbein.pp.ru>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Mbuf Clusters on 4.8
Message-ID:  <005901c33ca1$cf3e8c90$0000fea9@sandos>
References:  <000b01c33b7e$bc37fdd0$0000fea9@sandos> <20030626151007.A877@grosbein.pp.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > From this it sounds as it is a problem that should
be
> > fixed, but it
> > obviously isnt in 4.8. Is this behaviour now
considered
> > acceptable? And if
> > so, doesnt this make FreeBSD extremely easy to kill
> > using a simple
> > DOS-attack? Is this "fixed" in any way on 5.1?
>
> Afaik, this bug was recently fixed in both of HEAD
and STABLE.
>
> Eugene

Indeed, I upgraded my system and it now works as
advertised: If I use up too much resources, netowork
connectivity is lost, but once I disconnect those
connections, it comes back. (it even stops responding
to pings =)

---
John Bäckstrand



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?005901c33ca1$cf3e8c90$0000fea9>