Date: Fri, 29 Nov 1996 08:19:47 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com> To: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net> Cc: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans), current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: users of "ft" tapes, please test! Message-ID: <1300.849251987@critter.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 29 Nov 1996 00:19:29 EST." <199611290519.AAA07832@dyson.iquest.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199611290519.AAA07832@dyson.iquest.net>, "John S. Dyson" writes: >If there is not a significant negative speed impact, I would be tempted to >make the changes. It would be very suprising to see that an appropriately >coded splvm/splimp/splxxx would be much smaller than the subroutine call... >Have you considered coding the splxxx inlines in tight asm? Would that help? probably not, since we would disable the compilers optimizer that way. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1300.849251987>