Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 12:04:33 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> To: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> Cc: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, dyson@iquest.net, dick@tar.com, jplevyak@inktomi.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, hasty@rah.star-gate.com Subject: Re: lockf and kernel threads Message-ID: <199903052004.MAA52547@apollo.backplane.com> References: <199903051959.LAA82525@rah.star-gate.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
:
:> Little things like, ohhhhh disabling interrupts. Accessing the MMU
:
:And I supposed that we can not provide a mechanism or layer to deliver
:AST which does not require disabling interrupts, etc...
:
: Amancio
Not unless you want to rewrite the kernel. But it's actually more the
inability to access the MMU, cache control, and other priv instructions
that pretty much trashes the usefullness of ring 1 & 2.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon@backplane.com>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199903052004.MAA52547>