Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 22:51:03 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> To: Yuri Victorovich <yuri@freebsd.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: d22f15315b93 - main - devel/gmake43: Corrections Message-ID: <65w54zunovqsagaf2b45n5ip3y72r646jax6hzu3w35i3imr3f@aoyiarndzbve> In-Reply-To: <56f4fdc0-f9fb-4578-ae25-88bfc5aad9f0@freebsd.org> References: <202403292007.42TK7lhI072363@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <l4gu54w6ef4yqqvtetludbr4mo7krpifillf66loskj2lrc4vr@ntj6frlccsmt> <amuylyapksvtcss2q5ucsxxfi7yimynnoxa7ejjyn424h2lzef@52rxt2kwejxa> <56f4fdc0-f9fb-4578-ae25-88bfc5aad9f0@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri 29 Mar 14:17, Yuri Victorovich wrote: > On 3/29/24 13:56, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > As I have been told by other this is not explicit enough, an explicit version of > > this email is: please revert gmake43 addition we are not at a point where it is > > actually required. > > > But should the users of science/nwchem do (at some point I was one of them)? They can use the quarterly branch for now. > > With gmake-4.4.1 it builds for 20+ hours and times out. > > Try 'pkg search nwchem' - it isn't found. > > They aren't going to quickly fix the build. It isn't slightly broken, it is > broken a lot, and has always been. With gmake-4.3 it is also unnecessarily > slow, but passable. > > > Are you suggesting to just revert the change, and make NWChem broken again? Give a chance to upstream to fix (you contacted them only a couple of hours ago) Give a chance to others to analyse and provide a workaround. > > Could you please elaborate how is this going to make thing better? > > Is it worse to have one extra devel/gmakeNN version used to work around this > problem and fix the failure, or to keep science/nwchem broken? Because we don't always need a hammer to kill a fly, when we will have no other solution left then maybe this will be time to evaluate gmake43, but we are not there yet. Best regards, Bapt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?65w54zunovqsagaf2b45n5ip3y72r646jax6hzu3w35i3imr3f>