Date: Wed, 19 Feb 1997 20:14:21 +0100 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: wosch@campa.panke.de.cs.tu-berlin.de (Wolfram Schneider) Cc: freebsd-ports@freefall.freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD hackers) Subject: Re: ports/2756: top causes segmentation fault Message-ID: <Mutt.19970219201421.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <p1ivi7pvb5b.fsf@campa.panke.de>; from Wolfram Schneider on Feb 19, 1997 02:26:40 %2B0100 References: <199702180900.BAA14810@freefall.freebsd.org> <p1ivi7pvb5b.fsf@campa.panke.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Wolfram Schneider wrote: > > Recompile top. top is very system-dependant, and since you're running > > a SNAP, your first aid should be recompilation. > > > > top should probably live in the base system, not in ports. I've > > already removed /usr/local/bin/top on my machines at work since > > /usr/local is shared, but top is by no means sharable at all. > > Yes, we should import top(1) into the base system (src/contrib/top). > The top sources are only 120KB. Are there any contradictionary opinions? Even Suns ship with top(1) by default, and given its deep internal knowledge of the kernel structures, the ports version is pretty useless for a machine that is tracking -current (or even one that is upgraded by the official releases when forgetting to always upgrade to the most recent version of top as well). -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Mutt.19970219201421.j>