Date: Sun, 21 Jun 1998 01:59:22 +0400 From: Dmitrij Tejblum <dima@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: joelh@gnu.org, fenner@parc.xerox.com, peter@netplex.com.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bogus errno twiddling by lstat... Message-ID: <199806202159.BAA01831@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 20 Jun 1998 20:02:49 -0000." <199806202002.NAA17957@usr02.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry Lambert wrote: > > If, however, you don't like our malloc's current implementation, and > > think that errno should be saved and restored across a successful > > call, and that the lost cycles would be worthwhile, then diffs would > > be perfectly welcome, I'm sure. Too late. Peter has committed this change several days ago. > > Since the malloc.conf file is unnecessarily being looked for in the > printf case (since ld.so already caused it to be looked for, and didn't > find it), I think the redundant call to llok for it is certainly worth > removing. You have repeated this misinformation at least 10th times, I think. malloc.conf looked up only on first call to malloc(). ld.so probably call malloc() from the C library quite rare. Dima To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199806202159.BAA01831>