Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Jan 1995 19:40:14 +0100 (MET)
From:      Remy.Card@masi.ibp.fr (Remy CARD)
To:        roberto@blaise.ibp.fr (Ollivier ROBERT)
Cc:        terry@cs.weber.edu, terry@uivlsi.csl.uiuc.edu, hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: No lost+found?
Message-ID:  <199501191840.TAA14163@hebe.ibp.fr>
In-Reply-To: <9501191821.AA19507@blaise.ibp.fr> from "Ollivier ROBERT" at Jan 19, 95 07:21:30 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> 
> > One of the points of the lost+found directory being there in the first
> > place is that it must have a particular inode number (root is inode 2,
> > lost+found is inode 3).
> 
> I know that but I suppose that fsck takes 3 as inode for lost+found (haven't
> looked at the code yet).

	Well, on my system, inode #3 on / is allocated to /stand and inode #3
on /usr is allocated to /usr/mdec.  So, I suppose that fsck cannot re-use
these numbers for /lost+found.

> -- 
> Ollivier ROBERT     -=- The daemon is FREE! -=-     roberto@FreeBSD.ORG
>    FreeBSD keltia 2.1.0-Development #9: Tue Jan 17 21:12:14 MET 1995
> 

		Remy



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199501191840.TAA14163>