Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:31:56 -0600
From:      Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@missouri.edu>
To:        Stephen McKay <smckay@internode.on.net>
Cc:        "ctm-users@freebsd.org" <ctm-users@freebsd.org>, "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>, Andre Albsmeier <Andre.Albsmeier@siemens.com>
Subject:   Re: No deltas via email anymore?
Message-ID:  <4B57AE8C.4070003@missouri.edu>
In-Reply-To: <201001210118.o0L1IElB007517@dungeon.home>
References:  <201001201203.o0KC3r5E036646@fire.js.berklix.net> <201001202351.o0KNpsh3006649@dungeon.home> <4B579F5E.7070801@missouri.edu> <201001210118.o0L1IElB007517@dungeon.home>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Stephen McKay wrote:
> On Wednesday, 20th January 2010, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>
>> Stephen McKay wrote:
>>
>>> It would be trivial to change ctm_smail to send lines of 72 characters.
>>> It would reduce the encoding efficiency slightly, but not enough to
>>> worry about.  It is not worth making it optional.  I'll probably do
>>> this when I get a moment.
>>
>> This looks very easy to implement, namely change the line
>> #define LINE_LENGTH     76
>> in /usr/src/usr.sbin/ctm/ctm_smail
>
> Yes.  Multiples of 4 only.
>
>> So, would there be a problem with making this start right now?
>> (Remember I make the deltas, so I can make this happen anytime.)
>
> Righto.  I've changed my local copy from 76 to 72 and did a small test
> run.  Works for me.  I'll update the official source when I get a chance.
>
> A cautious person would do their own test run, of course. :-)

I have made the change.  The next ctm generation starts 10pm CST.  Can 
people tell me if there are problems?  I must admit to not being 
cautious, but the worst that will happen is that people will need to 
download those deltas from the ftp sites.





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B57AE8C.4070003>