Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 18:55:16 +0800 From: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net>, current@freebsd.org, Kip Macy <kip.macy@gmail.com> Subject: Re: ULE 2.0 Message-ID: <200701061855.17104.davidxu@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20070105154450.Y586@10.0.0.1> References: <20070104005625.D1508@10.0.0.1> <459DB871.1050109@freebsd.org> <20070105154450.Y586@10.0.0.1>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 06 January 2007 07:46, Jeff Roberson wrote: > On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, David Xu wrote: > >> Anyway, thanks for the pointer Xu. I may hack this up and compare it to > >> ULE's current balancing. > > > > Yesterday, I have tested super-smack benchmark on 2-cpu machine, ULE > > decreased performance about 40%, this might be a regression though. > > I just fixed a regression in the load balancer. On my 8way opteron ULE is > now 22% faster than 4BSD for select-key.smack with 32 threads. This is > for both KSE and libthr. libthr is of course significantly faster > overall. I believe I can improve this even more by borrowing some tricks > from solaris. > > Jeff I have tried it, but my dual-core Athlon X2 3800+ is locked up under stress testing. David Xu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200701061855.17104.davidxu>