Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 22:26:59 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> To: <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: devfs question Message-ID: <20011026222548.L88389-100000@achilles.silby.com> In-Reply-To: <20011026220946.X88389-100000@achilles.silby.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Mike Silbersack wrote: > So, my question is this: Does /dev really need to exist in a devfs world? > I assumed not, since procfs doesn't have a pre-existing /proc, but I don't > know where to look to find out what the correct answer is in this case. > > Mike "Silby" Silbersack Oops, error on my part; /proc does need to exist. So, I guess the question is this: Can devfs's error handling in the case of /dev being non-existant be improved? Thanks, Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011026222548.L88389-100000>