Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 21:42:55 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: pkg@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 210393] ports-mgmt/pkg Unnecessary compilation Message-ID: <bug-210393-32340-J0f9x1nv8f@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-210393-32340@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-210393-32340@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210393 --- Comment #4 from leeb@ratnaling.org --- (In reply to kpaasial from comment #2) First, no, this is not a pkg issue, it's a poudriere issue, I put this in the wrong place, sorry. Second, I disagree: Point 1: Port B actually was recompiled, but as it's version number never changed, the client never got it. Point 2: Port A is a run-time library, dynamically loaded. I fail to see how changes to it would require recompilation of it's consumers, provided it's API didn't change. If the API did change, then Port B would require changes as well, changing it's version number in the process. Can you please provide an example of how a dyn-loaded library can cause a recompile in it's consumer. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-210393-32340-J0f9x1nv8f>