Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2023 15:27:50 +0800 From: Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu@freebsd.org> To: Dmitry Sivachenko <demon@freebsd.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-ports-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 466d866ac89a - main - net/haproxy: revert QUIC support: it does not work with non-OpenSSL SSL implementations. We need to explicitly support LibreSSL. Message-ID: <CAKBkRUwMiZgT_h6GVt7nBGmCg_wLt-tUpUN9wLmK8wzUuWbD5w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <202312290614.3BT6EGpi079322@gitrepo.freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 2:14 PM Dmitry Sivachenko <demon@freebsd.org> wrote: > The branch main has been updated by demon: > > URL: > https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=466d866ac89abb1884c3c3efc5d96b18e7526a2b > > commit 466d866ac89abb1884c3c3efc5d96b18e7526a2b > Author: Dmitry Sivachenko <demon@FreeBSD.org> > AuthorDate: 2023-12-29 06:04:51 +0000 > Commit: Dmitry Sivachenko <demon@FreeBSD.org> > CommitDate: 2023-12-29 06:10:44 +0000 > > net/haproxy: revert QUIC support: it does not work with non-OpenSSL > SSL implementations. We need to explicitly support LibreSSL. > > PR: 267388 > Reported by: Ivan Rozhuk <rozhuk.im@gmail.com> > Please ignore me if the patch supports both SSL implementations comes very soon. This seems a bit pity to me. Is it acceptable if we mark QUIC is broken on non-OpenSSL while working on the further improvements? I feel we already made a small step forward and it's not necessary to revert everything back, as it's adding new feature and not breaking the existing ones. Best, Li-Wen [-- Attachment #2 --] <div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 2:14 PM Dmitry Sivachenko <<a href="mailto:demon@freebsd.org">demon@freebsd.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">The branch main has been updated by demon:<br> <br> URL: <a href="https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=466d866ac89abb1884c3c3efc5d96b18e7526a2b" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/ports/commit/?id=466d866ac89abb1884c3c3efc5d96b18e7526a2b</a><br>; <br> commit 466d866ac89abb1884c3c3efc5d96b18e7526a2b<br> Author: Dmitry Sivachenko <demon@FreeBSD.org><br> AuthorDate: 2023-12-29 06:04:51 +0000<br> Commit: Dmitry Sivachenko <demon@FreeBSD.org><br> CommitDate: 2023-12-29 06:10:44 +0000<br> <br> net/haproxy: revert QUIC support: it does not work with non-OpenSSL SSL implementations. We need to explicitly support LibreSSL.<br> <br> PR: 267388<br> Reported by: Ivan Rozhuk <<a href="mailto:rozhuk.im@gmail.com" target="_blank">rozhuk.im@gmail.com</a>><br></blockquote><div> </div><div>Please ignore me if the patch supports both SSL implementations comes very soon.</div><div><br></div><div>This seems a bit pity to me. Is it acceptable if we mark QUIC is broken on non-OpenSSL while working on the further improvements? I feel we already made a small step forward and it's not necessary to revert everything back, as it's adding new feature and not breaking the existing ones.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Best,<br></div><div>Li-Wen<br></div></div></div>home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAKBkRUwMiZgT_h6GVt7nBGmCg_wLt-tUpUN9wLmK8wzUuWbD5w>