Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 10:28:19 +0000 From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Eygene Ryabinkin <rea@freebsd.org> Cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Allowing CARP to use arbitrary OUI prefix and allocating block from FreeBSD's OUI space assignment for that Message-ID: <03D03A86-A5C4-4C0D-822E-D151AB272F35@lists.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <ht5ioSVMkYjTNaadctX3apO0nWQ@dHhGgwofm7uNfL6/X5%2BbGIkDUYs> References: <Nlrr646yWAdJ7EfNj9z5ymwq5ZQ@dHhGgwofm7uNfL6/X5%2BbGIkDUYs> <97B3C7CB-3E64-4FE0-81C8-F1FE6FB456A2@lists.zabbadoz.net> <ht5ioSVMkYjTNaadctX3apO0nWQ@dHhGgwofm7uNfL6/X5%2BbGIkDUYs>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08 May 2014, at 09:50 , Eygene Ryabinkin <rea@freebsd.org> wrote: >> Apart from that I thought the different version number was sufficient >=20 > The thing is that both VRRP and CARP packets use MAC address (on > Ethernet at least) that equals to 00:00:5e:00:01:$VRID. So in case > that $VRID is the same and VRRP and CARP admins aren't aware of each > other, there will be MAC conflict, so L2 packets will be switched > in a "funny" manner. How=92s that different routing guys running VRRP on the routers and server guys running vrrp on the servers and conflicting on the ID? It=92s a management problem in the administrative broadcast domain not a CARP vs. VRRP problem. =97=20 Bjoern A. Zeeb "Come on. Learn, goddamn it.", WarGames, 1983
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?03D03A86-A5C4-4C0D-822E-D151AB272F35>