Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 19 Mar 2016 18:53:41 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 204426] Processes terminating cannot access memory
Message-ID:  <bug-204426-16-MrFBmQgsbc@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-204426-16@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-204426-16@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204426

--- Comment #69 from John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Robert Blayzor from comment #68)
Ok.  Some of the changes in 10.2 fixed problems related to loading libthr.so.3
at runtime after the binary had started (which is why I asked my question).  I
think that my suggestion of using LD_PRELOAD would not be a useful test given
your reply.  It might still be useful to try putting a 10.1 libthr in your 10.2
image to see if just swapping out libthr fixes the issue.  If it does it at
least helps narrow down where the problem lies.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.


Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-204426-16-MrFBmQgsbc>