Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 22:49:18 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Aristedes Maniatis <ari@ish.com.au> Cc: Jurgen Weber <jurgen@ish.com.au>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portmaster cannot find package Message-ID: <4BF0D8DE.6020909@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4BF0B985.7020707@ish.com.au> References: <4BDFF264.9090608@ish.com.au> <4BE0434D.5070801@FreeBSD.org> <4BF0B985.7020707@ish.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05/16/10 20:35, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> On 5/05/10 1:54 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
>> Is there an apache-2.2.13 package in packages/All? And what do the links
>> in packages/www and packages/Latest refer to?
>
> I did some more digging in the script itself. You have some code like this:
>
> if [ -r "${LOCAL_PACKAGEDIR}/All/${new_port}.tbz" ]; then
> local_package=${LOCAL_PACKAGEDIR}/All/${new_port}.tbz
> latest_pv=${local_package##*/}
> fi
>
> But I'm guessing the confusion is that we have ..../Latest/apache22.tgz,
> but ...../All/apache-worker-2.2.15.tgz
No, the Latest doesn't enter into it with --index-only.
> That is, the package name is different between Latest and All. This
> particular code path is only invoked if you are using INDEX rather than
> the ports directories. When running without forcing the index, the
> problem does not occur.
The original problem you reported had nothing to do with the index, so
now I'm confused. :)
> I like the INDEX-only approach since we can have deployment servers with
> no /usr/ports directories to keep updated. A special build server is
> responsible for creating packages and pushing them out to other machines.
That was the idea, yes.
Doug
--
... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
-- Propellerheads
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4BF0D8DE.6020909>