Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 17 Sep 1996 19:15:53 -0700 (PDT)
From:      "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@GndRsh.aac.dev.com>
To:        asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi Asami)
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: RAM parity error
Message-ID:  <199609180215.TAA01319@GndRsh.aac.dev.com>
In-Reply-To: <199609180137.SAA09571@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from Satoshi Asami at "Sep 17, 96 06:37:45 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Is there any reason why the above would happen when it is NOT the
> hardware that's broken?  I've seen it on a couple of P6 boxes around
> here, with or without ccd, when I try to push a lot of stuff through
> the SCSI system (like parallel iozone's on multiple non-ccd
> filesystems).
> 
> I'd send you the dmesg output if it's not all disks.  I believe this
> machine has the Intel Natoma chipset with 32MB of parity RAM (9 chips,
> the middle one is bigger than others, is this the "logic parity"
> thing?)....

If you have ``logic parity'' instead of true parity you have defeated
75 % of the purpose of even having parity on memory.  I would highly
encorage you to try a swapout with some ``real parity'' memory and
more than likely watch your problem go away...



-- 
Rod Grimes                                      rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com
Accurate Automation Company                 Reliable computers for FreeBSD



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199609180215.TAA01319>