Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 19:15:53 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> To: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi Asami) Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RAM parity error Message-ID: <199609180215.TAA01319@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> In-Reply-To: <199609180137.SAA09571@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from Satoshi Asami at "Sep 17, 96 06:37:45 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Is there any reason why the above would happen when it is NOT the > hardware that's broken? I've seen it on a couple of P6 boxes around > here, with or without ccd, when I try to push a lot of stuff through > the SCSI system (like parallel iozone's on multiple non-ccd > filesystems). > > I'd send you the dmesg output if it's not all disks. I believe this > machine has the Intel Natoma chipset with 32MB of parity RAM (9 chips, > the middle one is bigger than others, is this the "logic parity" > thing?).... If you have ``logic parity'' instead of true parity you have defeated 75 % of the purpose of even having parity on memory. I would highly encorage you to try a swapout with some ``real parity'' memory and more than likely watch your problem go away... -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Reliable computers for FreeBSD
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199609180215.TAA01319>
