Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 18:55:56 +0200 From: Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu>, Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@sigpipe.cz>, Simon Barner <barner@freebsd.org>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: New port with maintainer ports@FreeBSD.org [was: Question about maintainers] Message-ID: <200507281856.02128.lofi@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz> References: <C3B81AFDB8A5DFB5AB566CC4@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050728154248.GA943@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20050728164111.GA66015@isis.sigpipe.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1192740.zt3fEfnuCx Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday, 28. July 2005 18:41, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > The policy makers won, everybody else lost. Hear hear. Of course, the regime actually already is in force and=20 port-submissions with ports@freebsd.org are no longer accepted. Given the=20 rate of port-submissions and the manpower available to deal with them, that= 's=20 arguably not all bad however. Patches/Updates for unmaintained ports don't make the submitter automatical= ly=20 the maintainer by the way. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --nextPart1192740.zt3fEfnuCx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBC6Q4iXhc68WspdLARAoLvAJ9mCS+I1jY4aE7YNzHkrbSRpQUWmwCfQLhU VELWl4xZzZSJUVbq+oQSz8E= =7g9S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1192740.zt3fEfnuCx--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200507281856.02128.lofi>