Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2017 00:20:08 +0200 From: Eduardo Morras <emorrasg@yahoo.es> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [OT] Why did "enterprise" crap seem to win? (re: Virtualization, Java, Microsoft, Outsourcing, etc.)... Message-ID: <20171006002008.0dd518da8b2173ff8c8cafa2@yahoo.es> In-Reply-To: <CAHieY7RLYQZU0enKe9OF0Ruw2A7vRi59rkoBpvGf2aLngkFw_g@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAHieY7RLYQZU0enKe9OF0Ruw2A7vRi59rkoBpvGf2aLngkFw_g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 4 Oct 2017 10:10:04 -0400 Alejandro Imass <aimass@yabarana.com> wrote: > .. or did they? UaUUU.. Good mail. Just to share real case, from years 1999-2001 (and repeated again in other job (2007-2010)). We began to build IT infrastructure, my part worked fast, low resources, in C, but the other part was being developed in Java. While my daemons read, process and write results directly in binary data files, Java still was parsing the binary input files, because it hadn't binary operators. The solution wasn't to kick java, it was to convert all data to xml. Since then there wasn't a significant difference between my C daemons and Java programs, because network (100MB ethernet) becames the bottleneck and the final problem wasn't that programmers team did a bad work, it was sysop team fault (the guys that controlled the network) that didn't design and measure the expected traffic. After 18 years, now I'm again in a similar situation, trying to move the business process from .NET/Windows big monolitic server to Unix philosophy, simple tools that do one work and do it perfect (and FreeBSD server). --- --- Eduardo Morras <emorrasg@yahoo.es>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20171006002008.0dd518da8b2173ff8c8cafa2>