Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 00:28:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Bob K <melange@yip.org> To: kmays <kmays@email.msn.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Use 4.0-STABLE or 5.0-CURRENT? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0006290027560.11092-100000@localhost> In-Reply-To: <00ad01bfe180$8ca74860$b8f11e3f@KenMays>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Take a look on releng4.freebsd.org for 4.0-STABLE snapshots. On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, kmays wrote: > I started talking about the new way to tell about versioning and remember > how current is noted by the "5.0-yyyymmdd-CURRENT". > > Question #1: Should be use v4.0-STABLE for production and > 5.0-20000625-CURRENT for new development/testing?? > > Question#2: What is the latest 4.0-yyyymmdd-STABLE version as of today and > where is it usually located?!? Is there a place to get the ISO image or can > a request to make a weekly or monthly version of it possible?!? I only saw > 4.0-20000307-CURRENT > > I think this is where people are getting confused (if not somewhere else). > I'm thinking to just use 5.0-CURRENT since it makes sense for bug tracking > and new development. Otherwise, if its not broke then don't mess with it or > use FreeBSD v4.0-RELEASE. Period! > > Ken > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > -- Bob <melange@yip.org> "Reality is the only word in the language that should always be used in quotes" - The Amityville Horror III To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0006290027560.11092-100000>