Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 18:26:45 +0900 (JST) From: Noriyuki Soda <soda@sra.co.jp> To: dfr@nlsystems.com Cc: current@freebsd.org, soda@sra.co.jp Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci pcisupport.c Message-ID: <199905120926.SAA19601@srapc342.sra.co.jp>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > BTW, there are many fundamental design flaws in new-bus, so I don't > > think new-bus is comparable with newconfig, yet, even if priority > > probe is implemented. For example: > > I'm not going to reply to these points as I suspect it will lead to a > pointless flame thread. I would prefer to discuss these issues in person > at Usenix. I agree that this is better way to solve the conflicts between new-bus and newconfig. Although I wondered why FreeBSD's core decide to choose new-bus before Usenix. -- soda@sra.co.jp Software Research Associates, Inc., Japan (Noriyuki Soda) Advanced Technology Group. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199905120926.SAA19601>