Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 19:00:37 +0200 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> To: Florent Thoumie <flz@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au>, crs@swcp.com Subject: Re: compat3x Message-ID: <20061019170036.GB1040@zaphod.nitro.dk> In-Reply-To: <1161248562.71755.2.camel@localhost> References: <200610181906.k9IJ6Ai4091879@sorsby.org> <20061018200455.GB945@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <1161248562.71755.2.camel@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2006.10.19 10:02:42 +0100, Florent Thoumie wrote: > Yeah, or use DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=yes (which really doesn't mean > much, I think IGNORE_FORBIDDEN would be a better name). DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES is to disable portaudit's checks, not FORBIDDEN checks. I'm actually not really sure what disables FORBIDDEN checks. But, I agree that DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES is a very poor name - if only the knob did what the name indicates... :-). -- Simon L. Nielsen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061019170036.GB1040>