Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:55:50 +0200 From: Gert Cuykens <gert.cuykens@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: flash Message-ID: <ef60af09041024235579a31baa@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <ef60af0904102423537cfb8ab4@mail.gmail.com> References: <ef60af0904102221565dbbd530@mail.gmail.com> <417A69B2.1070007@sydnet.net> <ef60af09041023111634bd0187@mail.gmail.com> <ef60af090410231220a688c5a@mail.gmail.com> <ef60af0904102423021787c31b@mail.gmail.com> <0800C9A6-264C-11D9-BB05-000A958C81C6@ahze.net> <ef60af0904102423184c444813@mail.gmail.com> <26FD3DFA-264E-11D9-BB05-000A958C81C6@ahze.net> <ef60af0904102423537cfb8ab4@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
well, make install in the fox thingy doesn't result in much flash actualy it doesnt do anything :) (damit pressed reply again instead of reply all) On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:53:11 +0200, Gert Cuykens <gert.cuykens@gmail.com> wrote: > well, make install in the fox thingy doesn't result in much flash > actualy it doesnt do anything :) > > > > On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:21:48 -0400, Michael Johnson <ahze@ahze.net> wrote: > > > > On Oct 25, 2004, at 2:18 AM, Gert Cuykens wrote: > > > > > And which one do you recommend ? > > > > > linux-flashplugin6, but try both and see which works better for you. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:06:37 -0400, Michael Johnson <ahze@ahze.net> > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> On Oct 25, 2004, at 2:02 AM, Gert Cuykens wrote: > > >> > > >>> Can somebody tell me the difference between > > >>> > > >>> /usr/ports/www/flashplugin-firefox > > >> > > >> Uses graphics/libflash (which is a GPL) > > >> > > >>> and > > >>> > > >>> /usr/ports/www/linuxpluginwrapper > > >> > > >> Uses www/linux-flashplugin6 from macromedia > > >> > > >> Michael > > >> > > >> > > > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ef60af09041024235579a31baa>