Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 05:16:45 +0000 From: Chris <chrcoluk@gmail.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: re: mbufs on 5.3-STABLE possible bug Message-ID: <3aaaa3a0502012116fecb8d6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a0502012116458a6154@mail.gmail.com> References: <3aaaa3a0501060612502ce616@mail.gmail.com> <20050106223854.GA97444@technokratis.com> <3aaaa3a0501081243395726d2@mail.gmail.com> <20050121175219.GA9829@technokratis.com> <3aaaa3a050121124314b6d041@mail.gmail.com> <20050201031509.GA32624@technokratis.com> <3aaaa3a05020105184b175d4b@mail.gmail.com> <20050201153718.GA43352@technokratis.com> <3aaaa3a0502012116458a6154@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Chris <chrcoluk@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 05:16:00 +0000 Subject: Re: mbufs on 5.3-STABLE possible bug To: Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@technokratis.com> 0 is supposed to mean unlimited, whilst leaving it blank(commented out) is auto. Or at least the docs say that. If I am wrong the docs need updating and it is defenitly a bug as netstat -m output is different. Chris On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 10:37:18 -0500, Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@technokratis.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 01:18:38PM +0000, Chris wrote: > > Sorry, yes have tried it, I am still seeing a negative perofrmance > > difference with the setting on 0 but the gap is greatly reduced and > > its something that is a lot more acceptable, at most it has been 10% > > worse then if left on auto or set to a value. Let me know if there is > > any specific types of tests you want doing. > > > > Chris > > I'm not sure I understand. Setting it to zero _means_ "auto." > > I'll likely commit the patch. Thanks. > > -- > Bosko Milekic > bmilekic@technokratis.com > bmilekic@FreeBSD.org >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3aaaa3a0502012116fecb8d6>