Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 08:36:55 +0100 (CET) From: Andrzej Bialecki <abial@nask.pl> To: Robert Watson <robert+freebsd@cyrus.watson.org> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: proposed mod to ps(1) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9901110835120.6084-100000@korin.warman.org.pl> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990110214955.11143B-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 10 Jan 1999, Robert Watson wrote: > On 7 Jan 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > Wouldn't it make sense to add an option to ps(1) to display the login > > class of each process? > > I was under the impression that 'login class' was really a property of the > class database in userland, and that the kernel didn't know what class you > were in, just the current process properties (resource limits, etc). > Programs such as 'login' set their resource limitations based on these > class entries. As such, ps would not know the 'class' on a per-process while on the subject... Does any of you know how login time limits are enforced? I couldn't find any place where it is done, and the real-life evidence seems to support my view that currently they are being just ignored... Andrzej Bialecki -------------------- ++-------++ ------------------------------------- <abial@nask.pl> ||PicoBSD|| FreeBSD in your pocket? Go and see: Research & Academic |+-------+| "Small & Embedded FreeBSD" Network in Poland | |TT~~~| | http://www.freebsd.org/~picobsd/ -------------------- ~-+==---+-+ ------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.02A.9901110835120.6084-100000>